Rail study looks at grain pathogen, pest pathways

Rail study looks at grain pathogen, pest pathways

Researchers evaluate rail systems to keep pathogens, pests from traveling with grain

University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences researchers are evaluating ways pests and pathogens move along rail networks in the U.S. and Australia in hopes to control movement of particular species or pesticide-resistant insects.

Related: Palmer amaranth can hitch rides on used farm equipment

Through their analysis, researchers identified U.S. states that are particularly important for sampling and managing insect and fungal problems as they move through the networks, said Karen Garrett, a UF/IFAS plant pathology professor and senior author of the study.

Researchers evaluate rail systems to keep pathogens, pests from traveling with grain

"The movement of pests and pathogens can be especially important when there are quarantines against the movement of particular species, or when pesticide-resistant insects invade new areas and make management more difficult," Garrett said.

Pests and fungi can damage grain and leave it unusable, Garrett said.

"In addition to this waste, some fungi associated with wheat produce toxins that are significant health risks if grain contaminated with them is not removed efficiently," she said.

These toxins, known as "mycotoxins," pose an important health risk if they are not detected effectively and removed. The movement of quarantined pathogens or pests, or the movement of pesticide-resistant pests, poses a risk to stored grain systems in the locations to which the grain is being shipped -- and to the crops growing nearby for some species, Garrett said.

Mycotoxin contamination in U.S. grain has been estimated to cost more than $900 million a year, Garrett said.

Managing disease spread
Researchers examined important locations, including hubs that are linked to many other locations and bridges that link separate parts of the network together, Garrett said. The analysis also revealed differences between U.S. and Australian systems.

The central U.S. is a major wheat-producing area, and wheat can move in multiple directions toward processing centers or American ports for export. In Australia, wheat production tends to move more directly toward the coast for export, and as a result, the internal system is simpler and in some ways easier to manage for pests, Garrett said.

UF/IFAS researchers are applying this type of network analysis to other post-harvest networks and crop epidemics so they can identify key locations for detecting and managing the spread of pests and pathogens.

"We are evaluating crop seed systems in several developing countries to identify system strengths and weaknesses for managing diseases of potato, sweet potato, cassava, banana and yam," Garrett said, describing other work with UF postdoctoral scientist John Hernandez Nopsa, first author of the current study. "We are also studying epidemic networks for diseases such as soybean rust in the U.S., to guide strategies for sampling and mitigation."

TAGS: Soybean
Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.